They Aren’t Genealogy Rabbit Holes they are Gopher Networks
Posted on November 7, 2021 8 Comments
We’ve had it wrong. Genealogists who go off on tangents who hop from this to that chasing rabbits back to their dens, we have the wrong metaphor. I have both hares and gophers in my backyard so I am surprised I did not figure this out earlier. But here goes…you know the drill you are looking for anything you can find on great-great-granny Emeline Jones and before you know it you are looking at her brother’s, Civil War pension file (he died in the Civil War), which reminds you, that you need to look for that Revolutionary War record for another ancestor. Then while you are at it before long, you are looking up historic maps of the area to see how close they lived to the battlefield, when you realize there’s a diary about a neighbor to your ancestors who wrote about the battle and off you go searching for a copy… and so forth and so on.
This method of research has been dubbed by my friend, George Sheldon, as Kelly’s rabbit hole Genealogy. But yesterday I had to correct him. It really is the gopher method. And the metaphor is perfect. You “go for” one thing and end up with lots of things you weren’t even looking for. You dig, and dig and dig and sometimes run in to stones and even a brick wall or concrete foundation and you just keep digging. Did you know a gopher can move up to 2 1/2 tons of soil a year? I am pretty sure I visit at least 5,000 web pages this year alone, if not this month.
Well I want to tell you about some heavy digging I did this past week. I started off working on my last blog post about the Fleur de lis, but that got me thinking very far afield. Asking “why” is all the enticement a gopher needs to start digging. But the why did John Shelden choose a Fleur de Lis embellished initials for a sheep brand in Colonial America was not a simple rabbit hole it led to a network of intertwined passageways back in time. And where did I end up? Two very interesting records. First, The register of the guild of Knowle in the county of Warwick, 1451-1535. Look at the beautiful pages of the illuminated manuscript here. And this is a black and white version of one of the pages :

So you might be wondering why would she be looking in the 1400-1500’s record of the town of Knowle? Because I can is the short answer. But before I truly answer the question I must share with you my research question. My question is a deceptively simple one: Where did the two early SHELDONs in America come from in England? This question has been asked hundreds of times in the past three hundred plus years and still there has been no answer. The best research was accomplished by E.Hortense Sheldon in her treatise Sheldon’s Prior to 1700 published in 1961. I have worked on this question in earnest with Dale SHELDON over the past 6 years including two research trips to England together.
A gopher can dig 6 feet deep and have a network of tunnels covering 200 to 2,000 square feet. That’s more than 1/5 of an acre and in my yard it’s closer to 1/2 acre overall. That’s because gophers are social animals. They move in, they bring their friends and family.
Again a perfect metaphor. We are researching the origins of two SHELDON men whose DNA has revealed they are closely related. One is an Isaac SHELDON who appears to have come to Windsor, Connecticut in 1639. The other is a John SHELDON who first appears in Newport RI in 1652 and ends up in Kingstown, Rhode Island. We do not know the exact relationship of the two men, they could be father and son or cousins but we know they share the same YDNA signature. To date the SHELDON DNA Project has sponsored a dozen YDNA kits for those with recent English ancestry and to date not a single one has matched the descendants of Isaac and John (of which 41 have tested and they all match each other). So where does one turn?
My answer to that question was two-fold. First, I decided to focus on all the early settlers of Windsor, Connecticut. And also of Kingstown, Rhode Island with a nod to early associates of John SHELDEN there and in Newport, Rhode Island (but I am not including them in this post). So what did I do? I worked backwards from these founders first sifting through to find any that either were from Warwickshire, England or did not have a place of origin identified or the identification was sketchy at best. And that’s what led to one Reverend Ephraim HUIT (HEWITT) who came to Windsor in 1639. And he is incredibly important because he arrives in Windsor about the same time that Isaac SHELDON shows up in the records and some have Isaac as being a part of a contingent who came from England with HUITT. The others arriving about this time in Windsor came from Dorchester, Massachusetts. By looking at the origins of these early settlers I can place them in two groups. Those who likely came with Rev. Huit and those that came from Dorchester. (The Dorchester group have origins in Somerset, Devon and Dorset , England.)
And second was to work forward from the records back in England. We are lucky that we know a bit about Rev. HUIT from the historical record. He studied at Cambridge and matriculated in 1611. He married Isabel OVERTON the 22nd of April, 1622 at Tarvin, Cheshire, England. It has been estimated he was born about 1592 but this is based on current age at graduation. During this time frame he might have been between 14-16 at graduation, so an estimate would more like be 1593-1597. Based on his marriage date of 1622 this might have been closer to 1697. He was first a curate at Knowle and then a Chaplain at Wroxall. He ran afoul of William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury with his Puritan teachings and ends up robbed of his livelihood, he immigrates to America.
So where would one look for records of Wroxall? Well perhaps in the Records of Wroxall Abbey and Manor, Warwickshire John William Ryland London 1903. And we can find many things there but of note is the lack of parish registers between 1604-1641, except for one critical page from 1634. Please note: “Sarah Huitt the daughter of Ephraim Huit & Isabel his wife bapt. at Wroxall August the 10 1634.” It does not get any better than that! ALso note there is a GRESWOLD (aka GRISWOLD) on the page.
So my list of early settlers of Windsor filtering out those that came with the Dorchester group looks like this:
- Rev Ephraim HUIT bc 1597 prob Warwickshire. Definitely at Knowle and then Wroxall
- Daniel CLARK b 1639 said to be of Wroxil. We find a Daniel Clarke bpt 1608/9 at Wolston, Warcs.
- John BISSELL bc 1590 & alleged brother Thomas 1589. We find John BYSSEL bpt 16 Nov 1590 Sheldon, Warcs. ao of William and one Thomas BYSSELL bpt 24 Feb 1588/89 son of John
- John DRAKE Known to have married at Hampton in Arden, Warcs. to Lettice SHAXSPEARE 25 Jun 1615
- Francis GRISWOLD bpt 10 Jan 1605 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; son of Clement
- Edward GRISWOLD bpt 26 Jul 1607 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; Son of George
- John MASON bc 1605 We find a John Mason bpt 21 Oct 1607 at Ladbroke son of Thomas & Joice (he did not have a Thomas or Joyce)
- George PHILIPS bc 1592 NO ISSUE We find George bpt 29 Dec 1583 at Eastham, Warcs. son of Nicholas PHILLIPS
- John PORTER bc 1610 We find bpt 13 Dec 1612 John Porter at Sutton Coldfield son of John PORTER
- Isaac SHELDON bc 1610 We find no baptisms for an Isaac SHELDON in this time frame anywhere in England.
- John TAYLOR bc 1605 uncertain he died at sea abt 1645. There are many possibilities for John in Warcs. But an interesting one is John TALOR bpt 6 Nov 1604 at Whichford, son of William
- William TILTON bc 1586 we find bpt 15 feb 1586 at Wolston, Warcs son of John. William we know had sons Peter, Abraham, Samuel and Daniel. We also find a bpt for a Peter 2 Apr 1620 at Wolston son of William
Twelve men. Of those, seven are solidly from Warwickshire: HUITT, CLARKE, BISSELL, DRAKE, GRISWOLD & TILTON And four are a bit more speculative: MASON, PHILIPS, PORTER & SHELDON.
Which leads me back to The register of the guild of Knowle in the county of Warwick, 1451-1535. and the early Visitations of Warwickshire. Why you may be asking. To see how long these families had been in the area. All twelve surnames are represented in the Guild of Knowle. All are very well represented except Tilton that has only one mention. The Guild of Knowle covered a very large geographic area which included parts of Worcestershire. These guilds often had a religious affiliation, provided for the poor and were a network of clergy, gentry, craftsmen and merchants. It was a fraternal association that fostered relationships be they personal or business. So they are an excellent way to find families before parish registers are to be found. And unlike the Visitation books they include the merchant and craftsperson classes.
There’s of course more to this story but here’s several RESEARCH POINTS
- When you can’t find something about your ancestor look at who his friends and associates are, track every last one down looking for clues
- Chase down every lead—every gopher hole
- Pay attention to surnames that pop up frequently when you are looking at your own
- Work backwards and forwards in time
- Don’t be persuaded by someone else’s sloppy research or speculations—they may be wrong (this is certainly the case with Ephraim Huit whose family goes back in Warwickshire for many centuries and is not of Cheshire as some speculate.)
When we are working in the 17th century backwards the records are often missing or incomplete so we have to search for every tidbit we can. That means unearthing lots of dirt hoping for a few diamonds in the rough. To be continued…
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
The Mystery of the Fleur-de Lis: Why would John SHELDEN / SHELDON use this symbol in his sheep brand?
Posted on November 6, 2021 9 Comments
You just never know what mysteries you will be presented with in your research and how sometimes there is very little to be found about them. Such is the case of John SHELDEN’s [John of Kingstown] sheep brand as registered in South Kingstown, Rhode Island in 1705. You might think why does it matter—and perhaps it doesn’t. However John SHELDEN and his origins are a long standing conundrum—so faced with such a dearth of information one (at least this one) has a tendency to follow any possible lead.

Before further exploring John SHELDEN’s brand, I want to point out the Brand above his, is for a James PERRY which may seem curious as his brand has a S imposed on a P. I suspect that this is because his father Samuel PERRY of Sandwich, MA would have been required to have a “S” for Sandwich and added the “P” and when James moved to South KINGSTOWN he took his father’s brand with him. This would not have been unusual as brands tended to be hereditary or passed through families.
Below is the brand of John Sheldon: “John Shelden his Marke is A slit in the Right Eare And A Crop on the Left Eare and A Afore Gad in the Same Eare his brandes JS on the Neare Buttuck”. When a J was used on other brands they also didn’t have the hook and did have a line through the center, but only John’s is topped with a fleur-de-lis.
ON BRANDING
It is claimed that on February 5, 1644, Connecticut enacted the first branding law in the colonies. The act called for livestock owners to ear-mark or brand their cattle, sheep, and swine that were over 6 months of age by May 1, 1644, and to register their marks in the town book. Livestock owners would be fined if found in violation “thirty-four cents a head,” with half allocated to the complainer and the other half to the town treasury. Earlier on the 7th of June 1637 the New Plymouth Court pg 118 “It is also agreed by the bench that all that have not brought in their eare marks of their cattle betwixt this and the next court shall be fyned in default thereof at the descretion of the bench.” In 1658 a copy of Plymouth Colony Laws appears in the Rehoboth Book of Law’s and it proscribes “the Markes for horses for Distinctions of the Townes ffor Plymouth a P on the neer buttocke, ffor Duxburrow a D on the nere buttocke” and so forth…. Rehoboth Book of Laws pg 84. May 7 1662 Massachusetts records Vol 112 pg 138 General Court Order Approving proposed nrand mark and referring the Selectmen to the Law for the ordering and raising of taxe in each town. Kingstown records sheep brands beginning in July of 1696. As livestock became more prevalent in an area the need for branding or ear marking obviously became more necessary.
BACKGROUND
The John SHELDEN of the brand above is the son of John SHELDEN Sr. bc 1630, who died between 1697 and August of 1704 when his son John Jr wrote his will [at South Kingstown, RI] and mentioned his “late father”. What we know of the Eldest John SHELDEN is actually not very much. The first evidence is 13 October 1652 when John Sheldon [Sr.] and Richard Knight witness a covenant between Peter Easton and Henry Stevens, both of Newport, RI. So we can first place him in America is in 1652. When and wherefore he came from is a long standing question. That little Fleur de Lis, just another in an endless list of possible clues as to his origins.
MEANING of the FLEUR de LIS
A possible list of associations
- Symbol of the Virgin Mary
- Symbol of Purity
- Symbol of the Holy Trinity
- Symbol of Catholicism in Protestant England
- Symbol of French Royalty
- Heraldic Symbol
- Makers Mark Symbol
I cannot shake the idea that the fleur- de-lis was used on the sheep brand of John SHELDEN for a reason and not because it was just a random symbol that he liked. The intricacy and skill at executing such a brand was beyond any of the others recorded. As a mark is a “symbol” of the owner it suggests in of itself a specific meaning and almost all the marks contained the initials of their owner. So why the fleur- de-lis?
WAS THERE A CATHOLIC CONNECTION?
We know that prior to the reformation under King Henry VIII all of England was Catholic. And afterward except for the brief period under his daughter Mary I “Bloody Mary” (1553-1558) Catholicism in England was either persecuted or barely tolerated. Then came James IV of Scotland who became a Catholic in 1670 and the King of England as James II in 1685-1688. [The date of the brand registration is 1705.] We know that the SHELDONs of Beoley and Broadway were devout Catholics. We know that a Robert GRISSOLD (GRESWOLD), son of John and Isabel GRISSOLD of Rownington, Warwickshire became a martyr to his faith in 1603 when he and a Catholic priest by the name of John SUGAR were arrested. John Sugar had been ministering to Catholics in the area [on foot] and had been saying mass at Baddesley Clinton. More about Baddesley Clinton shortly. At this time Robert GRISSOLD was described as a husbandman and servant to a Mr SHELDON of Broadway. Both John SUGAR and Robert GRISSOLD were sentenced to death. Robert GRISSOLD was given the opportunity to renounce his faith, but he would not and was hung, a slightly better fate than John Sugar who was hung and quartered. Robert GRISSOLD was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1987. Mr SHELDON of Broadway was likely William SHELDON, Lord of the Manor, who died in 1626. Broadway and Rowington lie a good 25 miles apart so an interesting association that a servant to Mr SHELDON of Broadway should be living in Rowington and attending to the priest John SUGAR. William SHELDON’s wealth came in large part from his uncle Ralph SHELDON.
The monks of Pershore owned the parish of Broadway for hundreds of years. In 1533 a disagreement between the Abbot of Pershore and his tenant farmers ensued. Ralph SHELDON was a representative of the tenants to the then Abbot John STONYWELL. They seemed to have had a long standing civil, if not contentious relationship. Three years later with King Henry VIII’s Dissolution of the Monasteries Ralph SHELDON became the first lessee and later the land owner of much of the Catholic church’s previous land holdings through Pershore Abbey. In 1539 leases of 80 years each were granted by the Abbot of Pershore to Ralph SHELDON for the Manors at Abberton and Broadway.

When Ralph SHELDON wrote his will 28 March 1545 he wrote “oure souveraigne Lord Henry the eight by the Grace of God, King of Englande, Fraunce and Irelande as Defender of the Faith and in the Church of Inglonde and also of Irelande in erth the Supreme Head” and that he bequeaths his “soull unto Almightie God and our Lady Saint Mary and to all the Holy Company”, and he directed that “every priest that shall be at my dirge and mass to have 12d, And every clerk that can sing to have 4d, and to other that cannot sing 2d. I will that a priest shall sing for me, my father and mother, my brother William and Baldwin Heath and Agnes Heath’s souls and all expired souls, Immediately after my decease five years in our Lady Chapel at Beoley or Abberton at the discretion of my wife and William Sheldon my son.” December 25 1570. His remains lie at the Lady Chapel [now known as the SHELDON Chapel] at Beoley and the latin marble ledger reads in part:
“To God, the best and greatest
This marble covers the body of William Sheldon, esquire, whose flame aroused by death returned to Heaven and there amid its kindred stars it burns and shines. He, devoted to his aged father, faithful to an unhappy King, loyal to the religion of his sires, succeeded late in life to a rich estate. Suddenly deprived of it on account of his inviolable loyalty to his King, he never mourned for it, but with equanimity bore its loss during his life. He pleased God by his uprightness; his contemporaries by his courtesy; the poor by his generosity; the world by his goodness.“

Of further note is a meeting that occured in Broadway in June 1644 when King Charles I rode through to Worcester to secure the Royalist garrison. He travelled back through Broadway en route to his base at Oxford and spent the night at the home of Mr SAVAGE, a Royalist supporter. [Mr Savage’s daughter Ann married William SHELDON’s son William about 1619.] In May 1645 King Charles I again was in Broadway and spent the night at the “Lygon Arms” where he met with William SHELDON, the Lord of the Manor. There was a pronounced connection between the gentry of Worcestershire and Warwickshire and the Catholic Church that may have been as much political as ecclesiastical, as seen above. It was not always easy to discern what side one was on and could have dire consequences if not on the correct side.
Due to DNA evidence we know that Isaac SHELDON of Windsor, Connecticut and John SHELDEN of Newport and Kingstown, Rhode Island are closely related and possibly father and son. We highly suspect that Isaac SHELDON immigrated in 1639 with Rev Ephraim HUITT, [perhaps with two sons Isaac Jr and John, both born in England]. Rev Ephraim HUITT was a curate at Knowle and later settled at Wroxhall as rector in 1626. In 1638 he incurred the displeasure of William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury (appointed by King Charles I). In 1638 Laud commented in a report on Huit: “He hath taken upon him to keep fasts in his Parish by his own appointment and hath contemned [reject with disdain] the decent ceremonies commended by the Church. My Lord the Bishop of Worcester proceeds against him and intends to either reform or punish him.” This likely precipitating his immigration to the American colonies where he joined the Rev. John Wareham in Windsor.
Wroxhall would be at the location of the former Benedictine Abbey and Priory. Just 5 miles to the north is Knowle. where we find the Guild of St Anne where we find many of the prominent families of the area. The Guild was a religious & charitable association founded in 1413. At its peak it had over 3,000 members, including senior clergymen and local gentry including the LUCY’s of Charlecote, the FERRER’s of Baddesley Clinton, the FETHERSTONE’s of Packwood, the THROCKMORTON’s of Coughton. Walter Cook founded in 1416 the College of Knowle, a religious institution providing a communal life for its resident priests. Both Guild and College were dissolved at the Reformation in 1547 and their property confiscated. The second Guild register (1451-1535) survived is at the Birmingham Reference Library. Here we find “Willffi Sheldon et vi eius de Beley” in 1486 [trans William Sheldon and his wife of Beoley.] Then in 1514 “Thomas Sheldon of Warwick,” in 1520 “Richard Sheldon & catryn“

BADDESLEY CLINTON
Returning to Baddesley Clinton the manor originally belonged to the BROME family but at the time of GRISSOLD’s arrest it would have passed from Nicholas BROME to his daughter, Constania, who married Sir Edward FERRERs. The FERRERs were Catholic recusants and there were three priest holes [hiding places] at Baddesley Clinton. One off the Moat Room, one leading into a ceiling space and a third in an old privy.
From the Reformation forward most Catholics considered it too risky to keep records. The earliest extant non-London Catholic register is a priest’s notebook for Baddesley Clinton which begins in 1657, but for most places registers do not begin until the late 1700’s. Looking closely at the map you can see that Wroxall lies in the province of Wroxall Abbey which was a Nunnery but further back there was a Benedictine Priory of St Leonard going back to 1135.
Here is a window from Baddesley Clinton showing the FERRER arms halved with that of the HEXSTALL. Notice anything interesting?

So putting these things together we have these curiosities:
- Ralph SHELDON of Broadway benefits from the Dissolution of the monasteries
- The Dissolution also impacts the Priory of St Leonard, a nunnery which was supported by the BROME and Ferrer’s families
- Mr [William] SHELDON of Broadway’s servant Robert GRISSOLD of Rowington is arrested and hung in 1603 for being unwilling to renounce his Catholic faith and his association with the priest John Sugar who was conducting mass at Baddesley Clinton. [Distance from Broadway to Rowington about 26 miles–somewhat a curious connection]
- Rev. Ephraim HUITT of Knowle and then Wroxall emigrates to America in 1639 after being condemned by William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury
- Isaac SHELDON who appears in the Windsor records in 1640 may have come with Rev. HUITT. others that “appear” to have come with him from Warwickshire are Edward GRISWOLD, John BISSEL, Daniel CLARK, Peter TILTON & perhaps John PORTE
- William SHELDON of Broadway meets with King Charles I in 1645
- Earliest extant Catholic records outside of London are for Baddesley Clinton beginning in 1657
- John SHELDEN of Newport is arrested for drunkenness and talking badly of the Lord Protector (Lord Oliver Cromwell) January 6, 1657.
- 1705 a Fleur-de-lis adorns the brand of John SHELDEN of South Kingstown, Rhode Island
So at this point we cannot say for certain the meaning of the Fleur de Lys of the SHELDEN brand found in South Kingstown, but one thing we can see are there are some strong Catholic connections and we have lots more to come on early founders of South KIngstown and Windsor Connecticut.
Further References
Hallmarks, Touchmarks and Guilds
SIlversmith Jeremiah Dummer of Newbury MA used a heart with his initials inside and a fleur de lys
Guildford-Saybrook Chests commonly used ROse, thistle and Fleur de Lis.
Colonial clay pipes were often stamped with a Fleur de lis
EUROPEAN CLAY PIPE MARKS FROM 17TH CENTURY ONONDAGA IROQUOIS SITES
Hallmarks on Gold and Silver Plate
Thanks to Dale SHELDON who did all the driving on our previous research trips to England and his help with this research. This is also published as a blog post over at SheldonGenealogy.org
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Right Reserved.
Drunkards & Lunatics: The Case for Original Records & Research
Posted on October 29, 2021 1 Comment
I cut my teeth in genealogy back in the early 1970’s when I spent many a day in the Prothonotary’s Office of Cameron County Pennsylvania in Emporium. Emporium is the county seat and its population has averaged between 2,000-3,000 for most of its last 150 years. So not a very big place and when I was visiting the courthouse back in the day—I very rarely shared the room, where all the records were kept, with anyone. There were row after row of MARRIAGE, DEATHS, BIRTHS, DEEDS and ORPHANS COURT Dockets. But there was one Docket that always piqued my interest: the LUNATICS and DRUNKARDS Docket. After several months visiting regularly I got up my courage to ask the Prothonotary the purpose of the LUNATICS and DRUNKARDS Docket. Ah she says, “the only way you could get a divorce, back in the day, was if your spouse was a LUNATIC or a DRUNKARD.” So that is how I learned about the DIVORCE docket. I also eventually ventured down into the musty basement where old tax lists and naturalizations resided. You never know unless you ask.
Sometimes the best research is just sticking your nose wherever you can. I am currently doing some research on King Philip’s War and my research into several Massachusetts and Rhode Island towns is informing my research in a way that is somewhat surprising even to me. In 1899 , Carolyn Hazard in her monograph The Narragansett Friends’ meeting in the xviii century, with a chapter on Quaker beginnings in Rhode Island wrote about the Friends Meeting House located on the ridge of Tower Hill on the Old Pequot Trail in present day South Kingstown, Rhode Island. Furthermore she states it was destroyed in December 1675 and many were killed inside when it was attacked by the Narragansett natives. Then in 1902 in The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations at the End of the Century: A History Vol I we read: “On the 15th of December 1675, the garrison house of Jireh Bull…was attacked and fifteen persons killed, the house was destroyed and only two of the inmates succeeded in escaping.” Ms Hazard states “It was the destruction of this house which was the actual incitement to the Great Swamp Fight, which practically exterminated the Indians, putting an end to King Philip’s War.” And yet in two thesis papers and 6 books I read on King Philip’s War published in the past 25 years, none mentioned this at all. And while not justification for the slaughter of the Narragansett that ensued it is an important part of the story. I do wish to recommend two books with original sourced scholarship. Richard Le Baron Bowen’s 4 Vol Early Rehoboth published in 1948 and Our Beloved Kin: A New History of King Philip’s War by Lisa Brooks from 2018. Ms. Brooks adds one more piece to the puzzle. Three months before the Narragansett attack of the meeting house its owner Jeriah Bull was encouraging settlement in the Pettaquamscutt Purchase. This was the native answer to the ever increasing English takeover of Narragansett lands. The original records matter more than a thousand recitations of the victor’s justification for the way things turned out and a wholesale whitewashed of history. [Pun intended.]

Which brings me to another deep dive and observation. There are records, never published, that reside in courthouses and archives that add much to the personal stories of our ancestors. In my brief visit to the South Kingstown, Rhode Island Town Records Office I turned up a list of sheep marks and brands beginning in 1697. There are a total of 84 listed for the period from 1697-1722. Most are simply the initials of the recorder. One of the persons that interested me is for John SHELDEN. Here is the listing for his marke.
“John SHELDEN his Marke is a Slit in the Right Eare and a Crop on the Left Eare and A for Gad in the Same Eare his brand is JS on the neare Buttuck.” What immediately stood out to me was the Fleur-de-lis at the top of the J. [Please note the Capital “I” with a cross hatch is actually a “J”]. I only took a photo of the whole page and this closeup but it really struck me that this was how unusual this was. So I decided to take a longer look at all the registrations so I visited my local Family Search Library affiliate and copied all the pages of brands.

John SHELDEN is the first to be recorded with the initials “JS” so the Fleur-de-lis does not appear to be an embellishment to distinguish his brand from John SMITH [but it effectively does] as seen above whose brand is on the neare Buttuck. Or from John SEGER who brand was on the Left Buttuck. You will also note that most of the brands including those on these two pages are simple initials. We have a couple more creative ones.
William BROWN combines his B on top of the W. Robert KNOWLES uses a backwards R with a K and finally William Mumford has a circle with a cross. But no other has a Fleur-de-lis or the intricacy of John SHELDEN’s brand. I will have a future blog post on the possible meaning or implications, but this bit of detail is lost if you do not look at the original records. And as I have previously mentioned the color photo I took in person is far more appealing than the black and white images. And if you are so inclined try doing a Google search on Animal Branding in the colonies—someone wanting to do a book could significantly add to what is out there…
My point is that unless you look at records in person or chase down every possible angle of a historical event or family history you will miss so much of the story, your ancestors invite you to tell. Looking at the records from the viewpoint of the Narragansett, the Wampanoag and the Sakonnet as well as that from the residents of the towns of Seekonk, Little Compton, Providence, Swansea, Rehoboth, Kingstown, Newport and Portsmouth and from the various religious perspectives: Quakers, Puritans, Congregationalists, Baptists etc. gives a much fuller picture of the context of our ancestors lives. Do not assume that everything that can be discovered or written has already been done. It hasn’t and you can do it.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All RIghts Reserved.
Location, Location, Location: Finding Records Look EVERYWHERE Part 2
Posted on October 20, 2021 1 Comment
In my last post on locations I failed to mention a few things that caused me some frustration today. I only had a couple of hours to photograph records when I was in South Kingstown RI. While I was there the clerk mentioned the earliest records were actually in North Kingstown which I did not have time to visit. So today I went to my local Family Search Library affiliate to see what I could find in North Kingstown Records. It was very frustrating to say the least. I also mentioned in my last post that Family Search had finished digitizing their microfilm records—wonderful. But their records, are digitizations of old microfilms, and there may be many items on the same film and they are not always in order, nor are they intuitive. I could not find several records I had looked at in person! I will have to go back and look through page by page. There is an advantage in looking at records page by page as I did in person, as sometimes records you don’t expect are found in odd places.
But here is a happy accident. The records for North Kingstown were badly burned and water damaged in 1870. However much earlier in when South Kingston began their records they copied the united Kingstown records (held in North Kingstown) into their ledgers. So this record is the Will and Inventory of John Sheldon from the South Kingston Record Book 1.
Looks like this in North Kingstown where it was originally recorded:
So if you are looking for early records of Kingstown you are better off looking in South Kingstown rather than North Kingstown even though the records are supposed to go further back in North Kingstown! I don’t know about you but I think the South Kingstown is more complete and easier to read! This also points out the difference between Photographing the original records versus looking at a copy online!
Which brings me to another issue which I have seen many times (especially in Massachusetts) there are often many copies of early records and/or transcriptions. Sometimes it’s good to use both originals and later transcriptions. Sometimes it is hard to figure out which is the oldest. So here are some things to keep in mind while researching early records
FINDING & COPYING EARLY RECORDS
- Visit in person when at all possible
- Photograph records rather than scanning old records (less handling & less chance of harm)
- Look in nearby communities—records aren’t always where you think they might be
- Look in every old record you can find—Births can be recorded in Town Meeting Records books or in Probate Records. Land Records may be in Probate books etc.
- Later Indexes do not always refer to the page numbers of the original records (especially early ones)
- Digitizations in black and white are harder to read than the originals
- If you photograph records you can later adjust exposure and contrast to make the records easier to read
- Be persistent, if you have time look at every record page by page
- Photograph front covers and first pages when possible
Happy hunting!
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.


















































