Who Should Own Historical Documents?
Posted on December 13, 2021 2 Comments
My Genealogy cousin and I briefly discussed this question during a weekly Zoom we have for SHELDON Genealogy. Both of us have purchased old documents on Ebay. Apparently there has been a market for British Documents in America for quite some time as one American seller was auctioning off their grandmother’s collection and several had stickers from a now defunct American Department store. What my cousin Dale SHELDON asked was, “Should these be for sale, or should they be in an archive?”
The truth is I see his point. When we collect or hoard anything (including ancestors and family trees) we de facto deny others the rights to it. Bits and pieces of history then go missing. Which gets me back to one of my earliest blog posts about Genealogy and sharing; and a difference between most British Archives and their American counterparts. I think there’s nothing more thrilling for me than handling a 13th century document at a County Records Office or Archive like the Shakespeare Trust. This cannot be replicated in America, as we don’t have anything this old. But frankly it’s an expensive proposition to be able to travel to the UK to do so.
However there’s one thing that our American National and many US Archives offer that most British Archives do not. Although you can take photos of documents in the UK (for a nominal fee) you are not allowed to use the images in a publication or blog post without application and usually the payment of a fee. In America the documents out of copyright can be used without restriction and I applaud our American open access policy. It spreads information more broadly and makes for better story-telling. I do however wish to put in a plug for the UK National Archives sensible policy to make digitized images downloadable during the pandemic for free. I hope that this might become permanent, as treasures should be shared.
It’s right there in UK laws about finding hoards of ancient coins which then become the property of the crown, they are then generally exhibited and shared. Why not take the same tactic with documents? I think this might go a long way at making new discoveries, sharing valuable information etc. But we need both an open access policy and an open use policy. Food for thought.
And in the interest of sharing and the hopes I might by doing so, provide information for family members or other researchers, I post here a recently purchased document from Warwickshire. It is not, to my knowledge, associated with any of my traced families in Warickshire but it definitely has families that intermarried with SHELDONS, BROME, GRESWOLD in Warwickshire include SHAKESPEARE, COTON, WILLINGTON. Other names in the document: KNIGHT, REPINGTON, ENSOR, FULLWOOD, FRANKLAND, SWIFT, FALKESBRIDGE. Place names In Warwickshire include Kingsbury, Cliffe, Little Packington, Whately, Coleshill, Bromefields, Fither’s Farm, and Nether Whitacre. Elsewhere we have Little Hallam in Derbyshire and Hinckley in Leicestershire. Many related documents can be found at the Warwickshire Record Office and the Shakespeare Trust in Warwick and Stratford on Avon respectively. But not to my knowledge the counterpart to this one.
So one thing that owning such a document does for me is makes me want to research all the particulars and share it more broadly and perhaps piece together connections that might help others. So in that spirit I offer to share the images and or transcription with anyone interested. Perhaps in another blog post I will share what I found but here’s some highlights.
- George SHAKESPEARE who had a farm at Little Packington shared the same Coat of Arms as that of “the” William SHAKESPEARE and the SHAKESPEARE’s of Fillongley
- Thomas COTON lived at Coton Bridge and left money in his Will for a school which you can find out more about here
- This indenture has an Alice ENSOR [nee COOKE] of Whately and mentions son and grandchildren, so several generations of the ENSOR family of Kingsbury and their relationship to the REP[P]INGTONs and KNIGHTs and SHAKSEPEAREs.
- Waldive WILLINGTON is one of along line of Waldive WILLINGTONs
I invite my readers to share their thoughts on original documents, our responsibilities etc. I ask the question does writing and researching and making these freely available make for better chances of survival? Can you ever truly own a part of history?
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
Paleography for Genealogists Part 2: Transcription of a Warwickshire Deed from 1675
Posted on December 13, 2021 Leave a Comment
The 17th century document arrived quickly and I have to say it is much easier working off the two originals! That said this has been a very challenging endeavor but I have greatly improved my deciphering skills. Feels as if anything in English is now a piece of cake. So for those of you who have never seen let alone handled a 350 year old document let me say it gives me the chills. That these documents can be in such good shape after that many years is a testament to the vellum on which they are written. Vellum is produced from animal skins and with English documents most likely sheepskin. The ink was most likely prepared from Oak galls combined with iron or metal filings and perhaps a binder like gum arabic.

You can see that while the text is the same there are differences. The lines do not start consistently with the same word. The actually calligraphy of each word may be easier to read on one or the other although the verbiage is the same.
In my previous post I gave you a list of books and references. I highly recommend compiling alphabet lists and common terms before getting started. I went to to describe my process as I hope it might prove helpful to you. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND “Latin for Local & Family Historians” by Denis Stuart. The book has so many helpful tools so if you are going to try your hand at a document in Latin you might want to consider buying this book first.
So what was the greatest help was finding an example in the book of a final Concord (pg 69). The sorts of documents you might encounter have a typical format and commonly used language. So for instance its very nice to look at the starting words:
And here is the opening for a Final Concord: Hec est finalis concordia fa[c]t'[a] in Curia and that is exactly what the words above say with the exception of “fat’ ” which is an abbreviation for “facta”. By studying this carefully one learns that the “H” has a tail, what appears to be an “o” is actually an ‘e” and what looks like an ‘r” is actually a “c.” Yep this is not for the faint of heart. But just like riding a bike it does get easier. However, discriminating between some letters is VERY hard. So there is a lot of guess-work and checking out of other transcribed documents that you can find. Looking at the third word the F is not too difficult but the peaks that make up “in” are tricky. Then we have what we might guess is a “t” but it is actually an “a” (more like the printed “a” we see in text like here.) The “li” are not too difficult if you know that is what they are supposed to be and then you have to get used to the final “s” which is used a lot. You would probably never guess the next letter is a “c” unless you had looked at some Latin alphabets. Notice the difference between the “o” and what looks like an “o” in the first word (which is an “e”). Then those next 3 letters could be several different letters but in this case read “nco” followed by an “r” with a tale and “dia.”
So needless to say it is a really slow process. One of the first challenges which I mentioned in the last post was deciphering the date. Then it was on to the next line and trying to figure out who the Plaintiff or grantor (aka seller) was and where the property was located.
This is the name of the grantor. Care to venture a guess? I will give you a hint the third letter of the first name and the first letter of the surname are the same letter. Need another hint? That letter is a “w”. Okay here you go the first name is Edwardium and the last name is Weston. Yeah I know it looks like Wolford but remember those “o’s” with a squiggle are “e’s” And that long large looking “n” is actually “st”. One of the ways I checked this was to look in the archives for an Edward Weston. The Shakespeare Trust Archive has a document dated 19 June 1661 (their Finding No ER3/2828) mentions a messuage [aka dwelling house] in the tenure of Edward Weston in Stratford on Avon. We also find a conveyance to Edward Weston of Over Whitacre, ironfounder for a property and cottage in September of 1684.
Well and doesn’t that work out nicely as we have the location [as above] Whittacre Superiors which translates Over Whitacre. Furthermore there are several other property deeds as well as the Will of Edward WESTON held by the National Archives written 13 March 1694 and probated 2 Nov 1694. Will mentions Edward WESTON the “Iron Founder” of the parish of Over Whittacre and the County of Warwick to be interred in the parish churchyard of Whitacre. The current Church in Over Whitacre’s church was not yet built, but there is evidence of a previous one. He names his wife Ann and children in order of birth for sons Edward, Richard, John, Robert and finally Charles. Also mentions daughters Anne SADLER, Mary and Marian WESTON. He also bequeaths to the church at Whitacre: 3 pounds 10 shillings and another 20 shillings after his burial. I wonder if Furnace End comes out of his holdings…

When I deciphered the name as Edward WESTON my first thought was my Dad’s favorite black & white photographer, Edward WESTON. I can remember my Dad taking me to an exhibition of his works in the 1980’s. Then last night I thought well let’s see if I can figure out Edward WESTON, the photographer’s, lineage and sure enough we have Edmund WESTON born c. 1576 unknown, married 8 Nov 1597 at Shustoke, Warwickshire. He had the following children: Elizabeth 1602, Edmund 1606, Richard 1610, Jane 1613 and Sara 1617 all baptized at Shustoke.
I have not found a baptism for Edward WESTON of the Final Agreement born about 1640 but I believe he is the son of the above Richard born 1610. There appears to be only an inventory for Richard WESTON so no hope of naming him in a Will. I do know the details on Richard WESTON’s baptism at Shustoke, 16 Aug 1610 and married 4 June 1639 to a Sarah Ratl? at Great Packington. We know he was living in Over Whitacre in 1663 and that he died in 1667. Edward WESTON of the document was also there in 1663, but no other WESTONs with Hearths.
Richard WESTON’s brother Edmund was baptized 1 June 1606 at Shustoke. He married about 1650 a DELANO and died in Duxbury, Massachusetts 3 June 1686. This Edmund WESTON was the 6th great grandfather of the photographer Edward WESTON. Lest you think I am clutching at straws the distance between Shustoke and Over Whitacre from center to center is less than 2 miles.

Back to the document. We find quite a few other names that help prove my transcription is on point.
Line 2: defensor(is) q[uo]d A conqu[ito] hues uno coram Franiscum North Johe Archer eq Hugone Wyndhaui Roberto Atkyns ut Justi’s & alijs Dom Regis fidelis tunc ibis prestntu. Int’ Edwardium
Line 2: Defender of the [faith] That together as one before Francis North, John Archer, Hugh Wyndham, & Robert Atkins as Justices of our lord King and other faithful people then present Item Edward
And this matches up nicely with a Final Concord and Agreement for the Court at Westminster Trinity term 1675, held by the Shakespeare Trust Archive [Finding No. ER3/3146-3147] which lists Francis NORTH, John ARCHER, Hugh WYNDHAM and Robert ATKYNS, justices, [in this case an agreement between John Keelinge and William PALMER of a property in Ladbrooke, which is slightly south of the map above.].
And finally we have the defendants or Grantees:
Line 3: Weston queria et Willim Cayley Armigereri & Marian uxer eius & Arthruius Cayley Armigereri defor'[cian]t de uno mesuage sexaginta acris t'[er]e decem acres prati sexaginta acres pastur
Line 3: Weston plaintiff and William Cayley Esquire & Marian his wife and Arthur Cayley Esquire defendant of one messuage of 60 acres land, ten acres meadow 60 acres pasture,
And sure enough we can find the CAYLEY family living in Exhall, near Coventry. Both William and Arthur are knighted. William marries a Mrs mary Cayley 2 Jun 1651 and they have a son William baptized in 1652 all at Exhall. We also find Arthur CAYLEY Knight marrying 16 Feb 1644 to Ester HALES at Exhall . There are quite a few property transactions for these CAYLEYs and also a Richard CAYLEY. Arthur is identified as being of Newland by 1677. [Newland is about 18 miles south of Over Whitacre but north of Ladbroke]. More of the transcription:
Line 4: quinq'[uaginat] acris iampnor[um] & urere & cen’t[un] pastur p nomin’od ant q’s cum pfud in Whitacre Supiors Unde pl[ac]itum conuec'[i]o[n]is sum[monitum] fuit int'[er] eos im
Line 4: 50 acres furze & heath 100 acres acres pasture by all who together with presnts in Over Whitacre Whereupon a plea of covenant was Summoned between them in
Line 5: eadem Curia Scil[ice]t q[uo]d p[re]d[ic]ti William & Maria & Arthur recogan[verunt] p'[re]dict[am] ten[ementa] & centum pasture cum p[er]tin[encis] esse Ius ip[s]ius Ed’wd ut illa que idem Edw’s h[a]b[et] de dono p'[re]dicto[rum]
Line 5: the same Court that is to say William & Maria & Arthur have acknowledged the aforesaid tenement and hundred pasture with appurtenances to be the right as those the said Edward granted with presents to
Line 6: Willm & Maria & Arthuris Et illa remiserunt & quietumclam de ip'[ips]is Willo & Mary & Arthure & hered suis p[redict]o[rum]’ Edw’ & hered[ibus] suis imp[er]p[etuu]m Et pre'[tere]a ijdem concesserunt
Line 6: William & Maria & Arthur and those they have remised & quitclaimed from the said William & Maria & Arthur & their heirs forever. And moreover the said Edward has granted for them and their heirs forever. And for this the said have granted
Still working on lines 7-8. The closing line:
Line 9: suis imp[er]p[etuu]m et c[u]r[ia] hac recogni[cione] remi[ssione] ffine and concordia dem Edw’s dedit p’rts Willi[am]& Mare & Arthurio centum & viginits libres sterling
Line 9: theirs forever. And for this the court recognizance remission fine agreement to be made quitclaim warrant fine & agreement the same Edward transfer presents William & Marie & Arthur 120 pounds Sterling.
I cannot tell you this was easy, as it was not. However tedious and time consuming it was much more rewarding than I ever thought likely. And before I bring this to a close there was one more serendipitous connection. The grandson of Edmund who settled in Roxbury, Massachusetts, namely one Jonathan WESTON is an early resident of South Kingstown, Rhode Island. If you are a follower of my blog I had identified the WESTON family as one of the families who immigrated from Warwickshire to South Kingstown.
So what are the odds that a document with no more identification than from the 1670’s in Warwickshire would have multiple connections to my line of research. Which brings me to serendipity. I realize that probability suggests that every now and then I will hit a long shot. However I do believe that we are drawn to things with which we have a connection. I would argue this is one of those cases. There are over 280 towns and villages in Warwickshire and there are 39 historic counties in England. Upper Whitacre is little more than a hamlet. So in addition to learning a lot about 17th century documents, deciphering and translating Latin I’ve had a smile with my dear old Dad. One of his last conversations with me he said, “Trust your instincts Kelly, you’ve always been right.” Not sure I’d agree, but I took it as quite a compliment coming from a strictly science and numbers engineer. His vote of confidence even though 20 years ago, has given me more confidence to follow those hunches or nudges. I urge my fellow genealogists to do the same. You may be surprised at the outcome.
Please feel free to contact me with corrections to my translation.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
Paleography for Genealogists: Working with 17th Century Documents in Latin
Posted on December 11, 2021 1 Comment
Sometimes I just can’t help myself. I see the hole and I just want to see what is inside. If you haven’t already noticed my current preoccupation is with Warwickshire, England and I recently posted about a document I had purchased—a reasonable early 18th Century document in English.
But my latest purchase has not even arrived yet and I am already working on it. Here was the description on Ebay.
Well any reasonable person would run for the hinterlands faced with the statement “difficult to read.” I tried to walk away many times but it kept beckoning me. There are no names or places identified nothing more than what you see above ” A Final Court Document ” from Warwickshire believed to be King Charles II. Some things you need to know about me to realize how silly I am:
- I do not read, speak or write Latin [although I do know some Latin Names of plants & animals] In fact I am poor at languages in general
- I have never taken a course in Paleography [the study of historic writing & deciphering & dating of historical manuscripts, including the analysis of historic handwriting]
- Other than visits to a couple of English archives my exposure to such documents is limited.
- I have however, deciphered German, Swedish & Norwegian documents although I know only a very limited vocabulary for each
- I like puzzles
So how did I end up here? Did I want to practice my Latin ? Not really. But I did want to be able to better evaluate documents. What better way than finding a pair of documents to transcribe. Lest you think that was a bad idea it turns out it real is quite smart since it is the exact verbiage on each side. So if one is hard to read you have a second try. To be fair I probably should have picked something easier—but many of them the sellers have already transcribed the pertinent details so not such fun in that, is there?
Please note that these documents were created in 3’s There would be the original maintained by the Registrar or Court [on the left where the line is wavy] and the two parts you see [wavy lines between them] that would go to the Plaintiff and the Deforciant. This way if there was ever a question of authenticity the documents could be pieced together. Originally, the word ‘chirograph’ was written along where the lines were to be cut, so that when the pieces were put back together again it could be proved that they matched each other. Sometimes you will see the word ‘chirograph’ in old archive catalogues – this means a final concord. The Plaintiff is the purchaser or recipient of the land. The Deforciant is the seller of the land. Google “Final Concord” for more information. [Final Concords were abolished in 1833.] So that’s what I did was look for other Final Concords especially those in Latin with transcriptions—because the format has remained pretty consistent over time—just like Indentures. I can tell you that most are much easier to read than this pair! Yes, I do like a challenge!
Here are some resources I recommend for working with old documents in Latin:
- A Latin & English Dictionary
- Google Translator
- Latin for Local History History: An Introduction by Eileen A. Gooder
- Latin for Local & Family Historians by Denis Stuart My FAVORITE!
- Devon Deciphered: Interpreting Manuscript Sources c1300-1750 by John Booker Excellent!
- Cambridge Online Course
- Manuscripts University of Nottingham
- UK Archives Paleography Course
- Additional Resources from BYU Paleography
- Palaeography for Beginners by Carol Bannister Roots Tech 2021
I find it helpful to have multiple printouts of alphabets from various sources for making comparisons. A list of abbreviations and numerals are very helpful. A list of the rulers for the time period and the dates of their reigns. [Since this is the way dates are registered in early documents]. And finally a list of the major Feast Days.
I have managed the first line so far:
In Latin: hec est finalis concordia fat [facta] in Curia Dui’ [domini] Regio apud Westmin'[ster] et die octe Annunciation un quindecim dies Anno regnign Charles se[cundus]s Anglie ffrance et hibernia Regine fidei
In English: This is the final agreement made in the Court of the Lady Queen at Westminster on the eighth day of Annunciation 15th year of the reign of Charles II [approx. 2 Apr 1675] England France and Ireland King faith [referring to next line]
I am open to corrections but I think I have this fairly close.
Wish me luck—and if I get anywhere close I’ll let you know…
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
More Gophering for SHELDON Origin Clues: The Technique works for any Surname
Posted on November 24, 2021 3 Comments
In our search for the origins of Isaac SHELDON of Windsor, Connecticut and John SHELDON on Kingstown, Rhode Island
As I wrote previously we gophered deep down on the early settlers of Windsor Connecticut who came with Rev Ephraim HUIT / HEWITT in our gopher networking (from my earlier post). Please note the HUIT or HUET is the spelling that occurs in America but in England it is more commonly HEWITT. This is the list we came up with as those likely to have come with Rev HUIT and possible English connections [updated below] :

- Rev Ephraim HUIT bc 1597 prob Warwickshire. Definitely at Knowle and then Wroxall
- Daniel CLARK said to be of Wroxil.
We find a Daniel Clarke bpt 1608/9 at Wolston, Warcs. - John BISSELL
bc 1590 & alleged brother Thomas 1589. We find John BYSSEL bpt 16 Nov 1590 Sheldon, Warcs. son of William and one Thomas BYSSELL bpt 24 Feb 1588/89 son of John - John DRAKE Known to have married at Hampton in Arden, Warcs. to Lettice SHAXSPEARE 25 Jun 1615
- Francis GRISWOLD bpt 10 Jan 1605 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; son of Clement
- Edward GRISWOLD bpt 26 Jul 1607 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; Son of George
- John MASON b before 1605
We find a John Mason bpt 21 Oct 1607 at Ladbroke son of Thomas & Joice (John did not have a Thomas or Joyce) - George PHILIPS bc 1592 NO ISSUE
We find George bpt 29 Dec 1583 at Eastham, Warcs. son of Nicholas PHILLIPS John PORTER bc 1610 We find bpt 13 Dec 1612 John Porter at Sutton Coldfield son of John PORTER of Kingstown- Isaac SHELDON bc 1610 We find no baptisms for an Isaac SHELDON in this time frame anywhere in England.
- John TAYLOR bc 1605 uncertain he died at sea abt 1645. There are many possibilities for John in Warcs. But an interesting one is John TALOR bpt 6 Nov 1604 at Whichford, son of William
- William TILTON bc 1586 we find bpt 15 feb 1586 at Wolston, Warcs son of John. William we know had sons Peter, Abraham, Samuel and Daniel. We also find a bpt for a Peter 2 Apr 1620 at Wolston son of William
However, when dealing with such Networking we can’t rest on our original tunneling. We need to challenge each connection to either strengthen it, replace it or eliminate it. I thought we would drill down and clean up the above list. Then add our list from the Network of John SHELDON of Newport and Kingstown, Rhode Island. The Bolded names of people with proven origins
- Starting with Daniel CLARK. Further research finds he was born 19 March 1609 at Wolston son of Sabbath CLARK. In June 1639, at age 16, Daniel and possibly his sister left England with their uncle, Rev. Ephraim HUIT and his wife Isabel OVERTON (their aunt, their mother’s sister.) However Sabbath CLARK was the brother of Hugh CLARK of Wolston, Warcs. Stott, Clifford L., The Staffordshire Origins of Daniel1 Clark of Windsor, Connecticut, and His Cousin Daniel1 Clark of Westchester, New York: A Proposed Pedigree, NEHGR (NEHGS, Boston, Fall 2019) Vol. 173, WN 692, Page 324-26.
- John & Thomas BISSELL said to be brothers and we find a better match than the one originally found. John BISSELL son of Thomas bpt 19 Nov 1617 at Solihull and Thomas BISSELL son of Thomas bpt 31 May 1613 at Solihull. It’s only 7 miles from Solihull to Wroxall and they are brothers, so this makes good sense.
- John DRAKE married 25 Jun 1615 at Hampton in Arden, Warcs. to Lettice SHAXSPEARE 5 children baptized there between 1616-1624
- Francis GRISWOLD bpt 10 Jan 1605 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; son of Clement and his cousin Edward GRISWOLD bpt 26 Jul 1607 at Wootton Wawen, Warcs; Son of George. Wootton Wawen is about 8 miles from Wroxall. This is solid previously proven information. These two are cousins. Arriving with Rev. HUIT and is documented first hand.
- John MASON because of his military service he must have been born before 1605 which leaves a couple of new possibilities John son of William bpt 21 Mar 1590 Barcheston ; or John son of John bpt 6 Oct 1594 Salford Priors. John’s daughter Israel MASON marries John BISSELL Junior in Windsor (so there is that reinforcement of the network). Barcheston has a very strong association with SHELDON as it’s the home of the SHELDON Tapestries and is about 23 miles from Wroxall. Salford Priors is about 20 miles away.
- George PHILIPS we find a better match closer to Wroxal: Georg PHILIPS bpt 10 May 1606 at Wyken, son or Richard. About 15 miles away.
- John PORTER turns out to be the son of another John PORTER bpt 9 Feb 1622 in Felsted, Essex, England so off our list.
- John TAYLOR to the possibilities we have John TALOR bpt 6 Nov 1604 at Whichford, son of William; but also of note is John Taylor bpt 10 Jan 1600 at Snitterfield, son of John; Or John Taylor bpt 6 Jun 1606 at Stratford on Avon, son of Ralph. Snitterfield is quite close to Wootton Wawen and only 9 miles to Wroxall. Stratford a bit further at about 13 miles. And Whichford is about 7 miles from Barcheston.
- William TILTON bpt 15 feb 1586 at Wolston, Warcs son of John. William TILTON of Windsor had sons: Peter, Abraham, Samuel and Daniel. We find a bpt for a Peter 2 Apr 1620 at Wolston son of William. So this looks very solid. Wolston of this period also had many HEWITTs so I am of the mind that this may have been a family & friends connection. We have a Richard HEWITT bpt 6 Sep 1578 son of Thomas in Wolston. Also in nearby parishes of Church Lawford and Brinklow are many HEWITTs. No Ephraim HEWITT anywhere–but my bet is in the general vicinity of Wolston.
- Richard WHITEHEAD who had a messuage in Knowle and died in Windsor, CT April 1645 . There is a bpt 25 Jan 1590 in Brinklow, Warwickshire Richard WHITEHEAD son of William. Richard had a sister Joyce (named in will) who married to Abraham FISSHER 24 Apr 1607 at Stratford on Avon (this Abraham bpt in Stratford 11 Jan 15830
Of the above list CLARK, MASON & TAYLOR are common names. We have proven the CLARK connection is familial. The MASON & TAYLOR, remain for now circumstantial possibilities. So we end up with HUIT, BISSELL, DRAKE, GRISWOLD, WHITEHEAD and TILTON as solid.
Here is a curious piece about Rev HUET and GRISWOLD and an investor William WHITING.

Although highly speculative there was a William Whyting in Bedford, Bedfordshire bpt 26 Jul 1590, son of Oliver. I checked alumni of Cambridge thinking there may have been a benefactor there but found none suitable. Yes, I am skipping over the Isaac SHELDON connection for now.
Switching to the settlers of Newport and later Kingstown with a nod to those with Warwickshire (or nearby) connections. We are looking at these because this is where John SHELDON settled and we know John and Issac SHELDON are closely related due to YDNA testing. This is quite a bit more challenging than the Windsor group. The time frame is later (1639 vs 1650’s). There is no single group coming at a specific time and some are second generation Americans. I am looking for connections with any of the folks above. These could be familial, geographic, religious or business related. Just a note on process. I am concentrating on the early settlers of Kingstown and those who were associated with John SHELDON in Newport. I am specifically looking at the Midland counties of England to see if there are any other families with connections there.
As I have noted in previous blog posts the more unusual names are the most helpful because they give us a smaller pool of possibilities. Surnames that are well researched are also helpful in our sifting process. Although be careful not to accept the research of others, especially that with scanty evidence. Try to keep an open mind because as you saw in the transformation of my first list. New evidence can change conclusions.
- William ALMEY b1601–says in deposition son of Christopher Almy of South Kilworth, co. Leicester, gentleman. 35 miles from Wroxall but only 15 from Wolston.
- Robert AUSTEN bc 1600-1635 probably closer to the upper figure based on the births of children. There are many possibilities but if we link to near Warwickshire we get Robert ASTON Bpt 11 Oct 1613 Birmingham, Warcs, son of John ; Robert ASTON bpt 24 Mar 1611 at Alcester son of John; Robert ASTON bpt 1 Nov 1631 Salford Priors, son of Robert. The last one is most interesting as the age is about right AND the possible connection with MASON of Salford Priors above.
- James BADCOCK born about 1612, as on 18 Jan 1670, he gave a testimony “calling his age 58 years, his son James 29 and his son John 26 years. There are no James BADECOCK or BABCOCK in all of England during the time frame. There are 3 bpt for Anna, Sara & Thomas in Radford Semele, Warcs. to Thomas BADCOCKE 1610-1619. None of his children by those names. About 10 miles from Wroxall. This name is found in 1460 in Whitacre about 15 miles north of Wroxall.
- George GARDENER bc 1615 about 40 possibilities in England. In Warwickshire just one George GARDNER bpt 3 Nov 1611 Stratford on Avon, son of John.
- Edward INMAN bc 1620 there are about 8 possibilities among them Edward INMAN bpt 25 Aug 1616 at Wootton Wawen (Henley) son of William
- John KENYON bc 1620 John KENON bpt 27 Dec 1618 at Fillongley son of William.
- Richard KNIGHT bc 1610-1620 many possibilities throughout England interesting one is RIchard KNIGHT bpt 6 Sep 1629 at Hampton in Arden son or Robert.
- Thomas MUMFORD bc 1625-1630 many possibilities throughout England tow of note Thomas MUMFORD bpt 13 Oct 1627 Birmingham St Martin, Warcs, son of Thomas; Thomas bpt 16 Feb 1633 Ladbroke, Warcs. son of Ephraim. The later 20 miles from Wroxall.
- Edmund WESTON Bpt 1 June 1606 Shustoke Warcs. By vicar John ROBYNSON. He settled in Roxbury, MA his grandson Jonathan born in Kingstown c 1706. 16 miles from Wroxall.
So of the list above only two can solidly be placed in the area of Wroxall William ALMEY of South Killworth and Edmund WESTON of Shustoke. Of all the early settlers in New England we can add a few with solid connections ot the area:
- Robert COLLES Bpt 1 Apr 1599 Robert COLES of Robert in Brinklow, Warcs. (2 miles from Wolston). He md 2nd Mary HAWKHURST dau of Sampson HAWKHURST Vicar of Nuneaton, Warcs; first settled First in Roxbury MA and ended up in Warwick, RI
- William COPP bpt 9 Nov 1589 William COPPE son of Thomas Hatton, Warcs settled in Boston, MA
- John EATON bpt 26 Dec 1590 Hatton, Warcs. settled in Haverhill, MA
- Edmund HAWES bpt 15 Oct 1612 Edmund HAWES son of Edmund of Solihull, Warwcs. Settled in Yarmouth, MA
- Thomas HUIT (HEWITT) Thomas (alleged Bro of Ephraim) bpt 19 Apr 1607 Thomas HUET of Thomas at Grandborough 20 miles from Wroxall and just 10 miles from Wolston.. He and a son settled at Stonington, Ct both died at sea.
- Thomas WELLES, Gov. bpt. 10 July 1594 Tidmington, Warcs. Thomas WELLES Son of Robert of Stourton, Shipston & Whichford on Stours, Warcs.
All in all a sound dozen that we can establish in Warwickshire or thereabouts and another ten possibles. So let us look at possibilities for Isaac SHELDON of Windsor, CT and John SHELDON of Kingstown, RI. We estimate a birth of Isaac before 1610. And A birth for John between 1610-1630 but most likely between 1620-1630. As previously mentioned there is no match for an Isaac SHELDON anywhere in England during this time frame, however we believe he came with Rev HUIT and we know the parish registers for Wroxall are missing from 1595 until June of 1634. So if John or Isaac were from Wroxall there is no record for them. If they were Catholic there would not be baptismal records. Which leaves us with just a couple of other possibilities in the vicinity of Wroxall:
- John SHELDON bpt 6 Mar 1611 Wootton Wawen son of John
- John Sheldon bpt 21 May 1615 Wootton Wawen son of Johannes
- John SHELDON married 28 Jul 1624 to Jone SHAXSPEAR Rowington Noteworthy that this couple simply vanishes–no births for children.
- John SHELDON buried 2 Apr 1616 in Birmingham
- John SHELDON buried May 1639 Solihull
So perhaps it is helpful to plot our knowns and possibilities on a map. Red are known SHELDON places. Dark BLUE Windsor Connections. Turquoise Blue Kingstown or other connections and finally Yellow for speculative connections.
There is one more John SHELDON who was baptised in the appropriate time frame. That is John SHELDON bpt 21 Jul 1622 at Broadway. I can find nothing more on this John. And as mentioned in an earlier post there is a connection between the SHELDONs of Broadway and a Robert GRISWOLD of Rowington. Robert GRISWOLD was a servant of a SHELDON of Broadway when he was arrested and later hung for being unwilling to denounce his Catholic faith.
The very real possibility is that John of Kingstown was the son or cousin of Isaac SHELDON who came with Rev. HUIT and that Isaac Sr was baptized in Wroxall and is among the missing 40 years of parish registers. So for now we have established where they HUIT/HEWITs were from, where some of his associates were from and a strong concentration of families in a 25 mile radius of Wroxall. And a curious cluster with a center in Barcheston with a 5 mile radius that includes one very prominent transplant to Connecticut: Thomas WELLES, Governor of Connecticut . bpt. 10 July 1594 Tidmington, Warcs. son of Robert of Shipston. This is a very small hamlet likely with no more than 100 villagers. It is less than 1 mile from the slightly larger village of Barcheston of SHELDON Tapestry fame.

Please not a possible hotspot is Wooton Wawen where we have SHELDON, GRISWOLD and possibly TAYLOR & INMAN.
Maybe not a solution to our quest, but perhaps a bit closer than when we started. I also must add that The GRISWOLDs are my kin and thus indulge me on a little more about them. Matthew Griswold (1620-1698) and his nephew George Griswold (1633-1704) became skilled masons and gravestone carvers. Scholars disagree as to which Huit carved the oldest gravestone in Connecticut. And who would that be for? Ah thank you for asking– that would be for the Rev Ephraim HUIT. Please read more here. I hope I have made my point that friends and family can lead you farther to understanding where someone comes from than you might have guessed.
Addendum:
Further evidence
In the 7th edition of Ancestral Roots, the following opinion of Douglas Richardson regarding John Drake was reported:"He believes that this John Drake came to New England with the Rev. Ephraim Hewett of the adjacent parish of Wroxall, co. Warwick, along with the Griswold and Bissell families." Source: Weis, Frederick Lewis, "Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists," 7th Edition, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1992. Pp. 197-198.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved.
Divorce Decree on Ground’s of Extreme Cruelty: A Soprano’s Aria Chapter 25
Posted on November 19, 2021 Leave a Comment
June 1 – At Westlunds sewing
June 2 – Lolita and Dewey came over to Jessie Millers. Syl, Jes, Dew, Lo. and I went as far as Oakland Lo & I called on the kiddie R’s and I accompanied Lo. as far as the mole? and returned alone to Hayward; walked out at 1-2 in the morning. Withstood trip well.
June 3 Monday – and washday cleaned house. Hot and exhausting work.
June 4 – Went to Oakland and bought goods for new (silver bloom) dress and soilsette for Milos herbs also mauve flowered crepe for night gown Called on Mrs Fryer at Fairlawn Hotel Fruitvale and had lunch rode down town in Lois’s little auto bought Dictionary—Funk & Wagnalls, and came home; found letter from Bro Horace telling of Uncle Asa’s death in Neb. and one from Eilene.
June 5 – Got second letter from Milo since he arrive at Camp Mills L. I. answered it. Jessie is making fruit cake to send to him. I made the handkerchiefs.

June 6 Thursday – Jessie & I took the box in to Hayward and mailed it. Then went to S. F. Lovely trip. Ripe cherries all along the San Leandro valley. White caps on the bay. Wind and cool weather in the city. F S was home so J & I spent the day in G. Gate Park. The children were quite elated because their father had just bought a new Chevrolet. I ran in and had a bite of dinner and out again just missing him by a hairs breadth. So it goes I was sorry that I couldn’t stay and fix Eilenes dresses for her as I had intended. It was a most disappointing day. When we arrived at Hayward we could not get an auto so walked out.
Friday June 7 – Aftermath blue as blue devils are supposed to be. Mrs. Miller went to the city. I clean up my cloths and do some mending. Cut out gown.
Sat June 8 – Clean house finish night gown. J & S go to Dorans card party.
Sun June 9 – Looking for Bro Horace. Mrs. Miller, Herbie & Esther arrived before we were up. Cool in the shade. A man is cutting Mrs Westlunds wheat for hay. All the hills have turned brown and are covered with little mounds of hay. It is a beautiful sight.
June 10 – Dull as Mondays are want to be.
Mon June 11 – Went to Oakland and bought me a new silverbloom dress and a nightgown.
June 11 – Making my new striped dress. Weather very hot.
Wed “ 12 – Jessie went to town to get buttons for my new dress. 3 sizes to match. I like them.
Thu 13 – still sewing. Mrs. Gentry drove in or rather out in her buggy to get me to sew for her.
Friday June 14 – At Mrs Gentrys place making her a wash foulard.
Sat 15 – Still at Gentrys. When I had the dress nearly done Jessie & Syl drove over in their Fathers new Chevrolet to get me to come to Hayward to see Mr Mosier. I went. The meeting was very causal just wanted to know what I wanted. I told him I wanted nothing at all. He had feared I would want alimony which he did not propose to give. I calmed his fears and then we all rode or drove out to Millers. He and I said good bye friendly enough. I know it hurt us both but whats the use? None. He told me today that I was as much to blame as he. Jessie went over to the city with him and Dewey brought her back late in the night. Lolita came along and they stayed over night.
Sunday June 16 – We all went out riding in the machine. Tried to find Uncle but failed. Went to Mt. Eden and drove around over the country awhile and back to Millers when we had a light lunch and then Dewey and Lolita went back leaving me lonely.
Monday June 17 – Got a letter from Milo saying he had got the box and pictures thanking us. And asking me to send a “housewife.”
Tuesday 18 – I was all ready in my new suit to go to the city for comfort kit supplies and to deliver a chicken to Mrs. Schlessinger for Mrs Miller, when I met the Post Man and got a letter from Milo, one from Allie one from Jessie Kendrick and one from Ruth Westlund. Here was news from New York Washington Los Angeles and Nebraska. Milo said they were sailing the day he wrote. I went on over to the city called on the children, Eilene accompanying me back to the Emporium to do some shopping. We got her a cape and stuff for Leo a suit. I got the comfort kit stuff and dident send it as I have to have an order for it first. Came home alone and lonesome.
June 19 – Wrote to the children in the city of S. F. In evening went in to Hayward with Dorans met Gentrys and went out to their place to sew. Stayed there Thurs.
Friday, 20, 21. Coming home Fri eve found Jessie busily preparing to take a summer course after all.
Sat June 22 – A change in the weather which has been scorching hot and is now cloudy and cold. I spend a gloomy day.
Sun June 23 – Looked for the folks all day. Nobody came.
June 24 – Jessie packed her grip and started to college. Syl thinks he may have to go to war and Jessie had better prepare to earn her own living. She was going to look at a house and lot on her way in to Berkeley.
Tuesday June 25 – I sent my suit in to Hayward to be cleaned and pressed. This is the first time for it. Have had it nearly 2 years. No mail again today and Eilene hasn’t come yet wonder whats the matter. Weather is sunny and hot again. Mother Miller washing. Later in the day I stood looking out the window and saw an auto slow up at our gate and back up down the hill. I said to Mrs M how many times they had fooled me thinking some one was coming and then they either changed speed and went on up the hill or backed down again. While I was talking I glanced out again and said O here they are coming up the hill again, I wonder they turn in the lane, Surely thats Lolita getting out. Yes she picks up Deweys hat that has fallen out and while he tries our awfully steep little hill I go out down to meet my Lolita girl. Im so glad to see them Eilene and Leo here in the machine. She has brought her sewing and is to stay. After a hurried lunch Dewey and L return to the city and still later in the day, evening in fact Jessie came home from college. The course was going to cost her too much so she decided to return and talk it over. We are all having a fine time visiting. Syl brought 50 lb cherries for 5.00. E & I sleep at Westlunds.
June 26 – We cut out Eileens cape she has not enough material so returns to the city for more. I receive notice from my lawyer to fix date for trial. Eilene will call on him when she returns tomorrow. I get on fine with the cape.
June 27 – F. S.’s birthday he is 50 years old. Leo [junior] and I awoke early, he looked at me and said Eilene aw daw. Dewey aw daw, and went to sleep again. Finally we arose. Had a great time dressing washing and combing and hunting the keys. Finally we are all ready to climb up hill to the tank house. Jessie is getting breakfast and Syl is dressing. It is cool and sunny. I am feeling quite well. I will sew on Lolitas white skirt until Eilene comes.
June 28 – Spent the day at Mrs Westlunds house sewing for Eilene. When I came up to Jessies place to lunch I found her washing so I helped her finish. I then went back and blind stitched the bottom of Es cape which is about 5 yd around the bottom and then cut out her house dress of Jap. crepe. Back up to dinner and back down to bed. The hill is hard to climb.
June 29 Sat – I am up at 5:30 war time, dress, make bed and am ready to sew as soon as it is light enough. Fitted the dress I cut last night before breakfast. I must make Leo’s suit today. It is cloudy out and might rain. Dident rain – very tired – slept soundly.
Sun June 30 – was a beautiful sunny day to end the last day of June. In spite of the continued dry weather things seem to grow on somehow. I help Eilene finish her sewing. Come up to breakfast helped get it. Went back to Westlunds sewed awhile, cleaned up the house and ourselves, rested about 15 min flat on my back and gathering up my things, went back to Jessies to sleep in my own bed again. Dewey and Dutch came while we were at dinner bringing some ice cream which went fine with our cake and peaches. Syl took me in to see the lawyer Mr. Perry. He was not in so we came back. Got the entire bunch, excepting Mrs. Miller and went in to Oakland to the Methodist church to a choral program, stopping on our way thru Hayward to call at Mr Perrys res. to find him in. He soon attended to my business and then we went on. There were in the car Syl. Dewey Dutch who was christened. Ernest Walh, Jessie, Eilene, Leo ba’e and my own dear self. The car behaved fine and got us in to town in time for the meeting. The singing was fine. The pipe organ with chimes very sweet. Roy & Rose brought us to the car line. Syl treated to refreshments. Walked home 12:00.
July 1 – I have a sort of after the ball feeling this morning, but am up early and none the worse for my late walk. Am spending the “morns morning” writing to my Bro Horace, my son Albert and my Diary. The morning is cool cloudy and damp. Jessie is sleeping.
July 6 – O but how time flies Tuesday July 2 Rose drove out in their Chevrolet bringing Essie for a visit. Jessie & I went back with her. J stopped at Melrose and went on in to Oakland did a little shopping and came home walking all the way out from Hayward. On Wed July 3 Jessie Syl and Mrs. Miller went to a card party at the schoolhouse. I stayed at Westlunds all evening and night. July 4 – Our natal day was right royally celebrated in all the bay cities but no I could not go It was too inconvenient and I was not well enough to walk so much. Herbie came out to see Essie that was our one and only concession to the day.
July 5 – Essie & Mrs. Miller went to S. F. We spend the day dutifully at homely tasks.
July 6 – I wash clean h. bathe and shampoo my hair. While Jessie waits at the foot of the hill for the mail it brings both good and bad news. I get a card from Milo says this and nothing more. “The ship on which I sailed has arrived safely over seas.” Jessie get a letter for Syl which says he has been transferred to class 1. Which great big news upset my Jessie so she had a crying spell poor girl. It is sad days for thewives.
July 7 Sunday – A very quiet uneventful day. Late in aft. Lolita came out and Syl took her suitcase in to Hayward. Then she returned. She walked. J and I took an evening walk down the ranch wood road and met Syl coming back.
July 8 Mon. – I helped Jessie dig potatoes at Westlunds which we promised her we would do to repay her for her many kindnesses.
July 9 Tue – Finished the potatoes. Syl found out he would have to report for duty Aug 3.
July 10 Wed – Hot sunny day. Dewey came out to look at the motorcycle. Syl has advertised the place for sale trade or rent. Lolita dident come today. Will work on Jessies dress.
July 11 & 12 – Nothing of importance.
July 13 Sat. – Lolita came out to the Miller Ranch. I was alone and glad to see her. J. & S. came home for the eve.
July 14 Sun — Dewey came out and got his motorcycle that he bought of Syl for $350.00. J & S came in evening.
Mon. – Went down to Westlunds with Lolita to sew. Stayed there until Wed July 17 when J & S went over to the city where L & I “moved” back up the hill the better to look after the ranch.
July 18 – Lolita & I “did” a big wash cleaned house and all the rest of it.
19 Fri – Still working on Lolitas dress. She is very proud of it.
Sat 20 – Jessie ironed I cleaned house Lolita made a cake Everything was done up in apple pie order. Then Fryers came. Got a squab dinner. Kiddies went wild over the live stock. They went back in the evening. J & S accompanying them as far as the Fruitvale station.
21 Sunday – Lolita Mrs. Miller & I spent very quietly at home alone
22 Monday – Jessie and Sylvester went back to town to do some shopping and see a prospective buyer for the place.
July 23 Wed – Ive looked forward to this day for 5 years when I brought suit for divorce in Minneapolis and was induced to drop it upon husbands promise to reform, which he failed to and today I am to appear in the Superior court of the State of California to get my decree upon grounds of extreme cruelty. I am expecting Dewey and Eilene every minute now and Lolita and I will go in with them. J & S will meet us at the court house in Oakland. It is now time to dress. Later Dewey had some trouble with his tire but arrived in time to get us all in Oakland on time. My hearing went off smoothly and the lawyer thinks everything will come out all right.
I gave Eilene the coat I made for baby and she was very much elated over it. We bought Dewey a silk shirt for I am getting ahead of my story. We bought the material for babys coat and Eilenes dress.
July 24 – Deweys 21 birthday. I cut babys coat.
“ 25 – Sewing on baby Leos coat fixed a skirt for Lolita. Jessie made Lolita a house dress.
July 26 Friday – Jessie Syl got Rays machine to use while he settled up the business here and secured another habitation wherein to dwell.
Sat. July 27 – Sylvester took me in to Oakland where I met Dewey and Eilene and we signed the papers. After which I gave Eilene babies coat which I had finished and we then bought Dewey a silk shirt for his birthday. Then Dewey took the suitcase and hurried home and raised some money to send Allie to buy a bargain in tools. Syl Eilene and I went out to lunch. Eilene went on home and Syl and I did some marketing for Sundays dinner and drove home merrily in his borrowed Chevrolet, for the use of which he had to buy a new tire. Jessie and Syl went back to Hayward to get Essie & Herbie
Sunday July 28 – I got up early and had everything in order when Esther and Herbert came in from Westlunds where they spent the night. We had a good breakfast of musk mellon fresh ranch eggs potatoes hot toast coffee etc. We four fared well here on this bald knob of a hill top where we have spent so many quiet peaceful hours and which we must soon leave. After a light lunch Syl took us on a little sight seeing trip up the canyon. It is too dry and dusty to be beautiful now but those lofty hills are always grand. The whole valley is busily engaged in picking and drying apricots. Mrs Miller and I canned some for home use after we returned from our ride. Syl and Jessie took Essie and Herbie to town. Jessie and Syl stayed in so as to hunt up a house now.
July 29 – Jessie and Syl did not return. Mrs Miller and I busy with the fruit. Go to bed late.
Tue July 30 – Jessie & Syl arrive about noon on foot. Rays machine went back on them when they were nearing San Leandro on their homeward way last night. We were disappointed. They rented a bungalow in Berkeley and we started at once to pack.
July 31 – the “Movie” man couldn’t move us today so he will come early tomorrow. We are gathering up the odds ands of things and truly it is as the Irish woman said “You never know what a lot of thrash you do be having till you go to moove.” Syl went over to the city to see if he couldn’t get Deweys auto to help move us in. We do not look for him until late. Syl came without the car. It was in the Garage being overhauled.
Aug 1 1918 – Up early and all busy packing up to moove. Thot I lost Westlunds keys but found them hanging on the door knob. I left the place in order and J & S returned the key to a neighbor Mr Frank. Westlunds will be home soon. Moovers came about 10. Mrs Miller & I got the new address the money Keys and directions and started on ahead. Mr Fraiser picked us up in his auto. I drew my money out of the bank $35.00. Paid Mr Perry 25 and then we got some very bad sandwitches at Kelleys and started for our new home. We arrived safely and found a very pretty brown shingled bungalow behind a magnificent palm tree. Our vine and fig pear and apricot trees are in the back yard. We got pretty tired waiting. They came about 3 o’clock pigeons goats and all. We started setting up furniture at so late in the evening J. & Syl came with 40 squabs that they had dressed and told us that they had sold the pigeons for $2.25 per doz. a rediculous small price.
Fri Aug 2 1918 – Jessie & Syl are off early to settle up their affairs. Mother Miller & I are busy as bees unpacking and cleaning house.
Sat 3 – Still getting things settled at our new address. 1534 Bonita Ave Berkeley California.
Sun. Aug 4 – Very tired slept late. Breakfast at 10 taking it easy Mother Miller went out and got the sun papers. Dinner at 6 Ray and Rose came in.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All RIghts Reserved.
Getting in Trouble in Early Rhode Island: John SHELDEN / SHELDON of Newport & Kingstown
Posted on November 13, 2021 1 Comment
I have come to love the ancestors that got into mischief and survived to be my ancestors. Such is the case of my dear John SHELDEN and one of the first records of him on these shores. I, like my cousin Dale SHELDON find his escapade a delightful insight into our ancestor.
Newport
From The RI Court Records Vol 1 pg 37
“John Sheldon Beinge by Recognzence bownd to this Court and by the Cenrl Aturny indicted for an afray by Disorderly Carridges acted in and at Thomas Coulds howse on the 6th janr 1657. The jurry impanelled: upon the Traverce pleads not guilty And refferrs him Selfe to god and Guntry for Tryall.”John Sheldon Beinge by Recognzence bownd to this Court and by the Cenrl Aturny indicted for an afray by Disorderly Carridges acted in and at Thomas Coulds howse on the 6th janr 1657.
The jurry returned and their answer is that the indictments came not Soe orderly to them as to justify them to give in A verditt because it had not beine passed on by A grand in quest before hand.
Thomas Gould Robert Griffin Edmund Audly John Sheldon and Thomas Winterton all of newptt Beinge bownd over to this Court for Disorders Done at Thomas Goulds house on Wedensday night the sixt of January last and the Court haveinge had A verry strict and a Searious hereinge and inquiry into the matter are convinced that the sayd persons in their then drinkinge helths intended nothing against the dignity of his highnes the lord protector, &cr thay also Solemly Denyinge any indignity intended in the same, and also confesinge their sorrow for their Rude and unorderly Caridges at the afore-sayd time and place, and of makeinge soe much disturbance therby and promisinge every one of them to Endeavour to avoyd the licke Disorderly actions againe, the Court are pleased noe longer to continue the sayd persons to stand bownd but upon paying Fees due to officers of Court thay are Discharged by proclamation in open Court.”
To place these transgressions in context let us have a closer look at the laws he violated.

Apparently a dim view of drunkenness was taken by the Colony of Rhode Island. It looks as if the young men got off with a fine of five shillings, being sufficiently repentant. The charge of speaking against the Lord Proctor (Oliver Cromwell as acting head of England), a much more serious charge could have much more serious consequences. See the consequence should they have been convicted. (Hung, cut down drawn and quartered).

Since we do not see our John SHELDEN back in the court records it seems he must have learned his lesson. What else can we learn from this record?
If you have been reading my blog posts on gophering you will realize that looking closer at the friends of your ancestors may provide dividends. So we have John SHELDEN’s friends who were arrested and charged with him: Thomas Gould, Robert Griffin, Edmund Audly and Thomas Winterton, who else is a part of this record? We have the Pettit jurors who heard his case. Remember when searching for origins across the pond everyone your ancestor came in contact with is a potential clue. And back in 1657 Rhode Island people knew each other. It truly was a jury of your peers. In 1650 the total population of Rhode Island was 785 and by 1660 1539. So for Newport it was likely a few hundred at most. So who was on the jury:
- Mr. John EASTON, foreman (1624-1705) bpt 15 Dec 1622 Romsey, Hampshire
- Edward ENMAN (INMAN) (bc1620-1706) possibly bpt 25 Aug 1616 Edward INMAN s of William at Wootton Wawen, Warcs.
- Capt. Thomas COOKE (1600-1677) 13 Apr 1600 in Netherbury, Dorsetshire, England
- James BADECOCKE (1612-1607) unknown possibly Redford, Semele, Warwickshire
- Thomas LAYTON (1614-1681) 17 Apr 1614 in Cranfield, Bedfordshire, England
- Mr Peter EASTON (1624-1705) bro of John above bpt 19 Dec 1624 Romsey, Hampshire
- Henry BULL (1610-1684) perhaps bpt 14 Dec 1606 Henry Bull s of Mr Bull Sutton Coldfield, Warcs.
- Petter GREENE (1622-1659) bpt 10 Mar 1622 in Salisbury, Wiltshire, England
- Sam WILBORE (1614-1697) possibly 1614 in Sible Hedingham, Essex, England
- Francis BRAYTON (1612-1692) unknown origin
- Lott STRAINGE (STRANGE) (1647-1690 too young) so perhaps John (Lott?) STRANGE bpt 3 Jun 1623 Ashchurch, Gloucestershire
- John ALMY (1637-1676) son of William ALMY bc 1601 possibly son of Christopher Almy of South Kilworth, co. Leicester, England
So we are going to scrutinize all the families in John’s network of friends and family. Sadly we do not have John’s wife’s surname and we only know of one child. So we have no choice but to focus on his friends and neighbors, since some ancestors leave very little behind. We have 3 possibilities for people with a connection is the area that John’s YDNA relative appears to be from. All are speculative. Adding his friends we have:
- Thomas GOULD (bc1623-?)possibilities bpt 15 May 1602 Thomas GOULD, Nuneaton Warcs.; bpt 12 Jan 1605 Upton Snodsbury, Worces Thomas GOOLD; or bpt 2 Feb 1625 Birmingham, Warcs. Thomas GOOLD
- Robert GRIFFIN (bc 1620?-1684) no agreement (All Midlands) bpt 28 Jan 1601 Rob Griffin Allesley, Warwickshire; bpt. 24 Nov 1624 Blockely, Wiltshire
- Thomas WINTERTON (bc1620?-?) possibly bpt 10 Feb 1621 Kimcote, Leics.; bpt 10 Dec 1620 Wyken, Coventry, Warcs OR bpt 4 Jan 1607 Claybroke, Leceistershire
Let us now turn to the first record we have of John SHELDON when he was a witness 13 Oct. 1652 “John Sheldon and Richard Knight witness a covenant between Peter Easton and Henry Stevens, both of Newport, RI.” This would be the same as the Peter Eastman above and we can add RIchard Knight and Henry Stevens.
- Richard KNIGHT (1620?-1680) several good possibilities bpt 19 Oct 1626 Wootton Wawen, Warcs; bpt 5 Dec 1619 Hampton in Arden; bpt 6 Oct 1624 Brailes, Warcs.; 13 Dec 1612 Long Compton, Warcs.
- Henry STEVENS (1620-1676?) possibly bpt 25 Mar 1605 Aston Juxta, Birmingham, Warcs
NARRAGANSETT COUNTRY later KINGSTOWNE
On the 20th Jan 1657, the land Company known as the Pettaquascutt Purchasers acquired a large tract of land measuring approximately twelve square miles (encompassing much of present day Kingstown). The deed was executed between the Naragansett Indian Sachems: Qussaquanch, Kachansquant and Quequaquenuet and John HULL of Boston, John PORTER Samuel WILBOR, Samuel WILSON and Thomas MUMFORD all of Rhode Island. Two later members added were Benedict ARNOLD the first and William BRETON. The lands were broken up so that each member received woodlands, marshlands and farmland.
Next, 18 Apr 1663, is a record where John SHELDON is a witness to a deed from Zachery RHOADES to Stephen ARNOLD both of Pawtuxet. Zachery RHOADES deeded 100 acres of land on the shore of the Pawtuxet River to his brother in law Stephen ARNOLD. Zachery married Joane ARNOLD, but he died just two years later, in a drowning accident off the Pawtuxet shore. The older brother of Stephen and Joane and first born, was Benedict ARNOLD I, all children of William ARNOLD of Ilchester, Somerset, England Benedict ARNOLD I, as noted above, was one of the Pettquascutt purchasers. He went on to become the first Governor of Rhode Island. (It is Benedict Arnold V who is notorious for defecting from the Continental Army to the British army during the Revolutionary War.)
Then 19th of January 1664 Henry HALL and Richard KNIGHT purchase from the Chief Sachem of the Naragansetts a large tract of land in present day Kingstown Rhode Island and later referred to as the Hall-Knight Purchase. This tract was to the west of the Pettaquascutt Purchase. The boundary between being known as the Pettaquascutt line. [See second map below.]
A deed of 22 Sep 1671 recorded 26 Oct 1683 from Benjamin CONGDON to John SHELDON of Narragansett Country, Planter, for seven pounds being 33 acres of a larger parcel had by CONGDON 22 Sept 1671 from William BRENTON, Benedict ARNOLD, John HULL, John PORTER, Samuel WILBOR, Samuel WILSON and Thomas MUMFORD ( the original Pettaquascutt Purchasers).

Another view rotated with North at top and approximate location of John SHELDON Senior’s property.
Then we have on July 29, 1679 forty-two residents of the Narragansett Country signing a petition to King Charles I of England asking him to make a judgement as to which colony the Narragansett Country belonged to. Was it to be Massachusetts Bay Colony, Connecticut or Rhode Island? “John SHELLDIN” and “John SHELDON Jun’r” signed this petition.
In 1681, forty residents of Narragansett founded the new town of South Kingstown and we find John SHILLDON and John SHELDON Junior among them. This is copy taken in 1723 from the original town records of Kingstown before it became North and South Kingstown of the original 1679 record. Since John Sheldon senior does not appear on this list we can assume he died between August 1679 and December of 1696.
CORRECTION: Although it appears in the South Kingstown Book shown above as only John SHELDON Jr. the one from an earlier version apparently showing a more complete list does include John SHELDEN (senior). See below. So my original hypothesis must be amended and it would appear that John SHELDEN senior died between Dec 1696 and the writing of John Juniors Will in 1704.
That is the sum total that we have for John SHELDEN/ SHELDON. We know he had a son John SHELDON Junior, however we do not have a birthdate for him nor for John SHELDON senior’s marriage or the births of any of his other children, if he had any others. Since his son John was a signatory in 1679 we can assume he was at least 21 at the time making his birth at or before 1658. We also know that John Senior was a witness in 1652 placing his birth probably before 1630, however he could have been born much earlier. If we look at the friends that he was arrested with their births look likely to have occurred between 1601-1625 so that leaves a very broad window of between 1601-1630. Will delve into possibilities for his birthplace in another post and further scrutinize his friends likely origins.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All RIghts Reserved.
How a Historical Novel Inspired my Genealogy Research: In Praise of Gopher Holes
Posted on November 11, 2021 Leave a Comment
In my blog post “They Aren’t Rabbit Holes they are Genealogy Networks” I wrote about my deep dive back into 15th and 16th Century documents while trying to locate the origins of 17th Century English immigrants to America. This is the another part of the story. It all started when Dale and I were planning our second genealogical research trip to England. Once we had a rough itinerary I took a look at my Family Tree Maker tree to see if I had any other ancestors in the areas we were visiting. That is how I discovered my murderous ancestor, Nicholas BROOME (1450-1517). Nicholas is my 13th great grandfather. His father was John BROME (1410-1468) and he was the purchaser in 1438 and owner of the lovely moated Manor house, Baddesley Clinton, which is now a National Trust Property.

John BROME was Under Treasurer of England and was murdered on the porch of Whitefriars Church in London over what appears to be a property dispute back in Warwick with John HERTHILL, who just happened to be the steward of Richard Neville, aka the Kingmaker. [I feel as if there is more to this story than the historical record has revealed so far.] Well, it seems young Nicholas, some three years after his father’s murder met up with John HERTHILL in Longbridge Field on his was back from Barford to Warwick. It is here in Longbridge Field that young Nicholas, now almost 21 takes the life of John HERTHILL.

In addition to Baddesley Clinton, which lies some 10 miles northwest of Warwick, Nicholas, upon his father’s death, acquired the lovely Brome Place strategically located just opposite Warwick Castle in Warwick. At the time there was a bridge that crossed straight over to the Castle. Nicolas suffers no imprisonment for his crime and atones for this and future sins—but perhaps that deserves its own blog post.
While doing research on Nicholas BROME I found a lovely short historical novel called “My Husband: The Extraordinary History of Nicholas Brome by Anne Elliot ” which I devoured before my trip. It mentions the Guild of the Holy Cross in Stratford on Avon which I had been to before. Anne Elliott cleverly uses Nicholas’ membership in the Guild of the Holy Cross as a vehicle for her characters to meet. And that became the future inspiration for my research, because I realized that fraternal organizations were a powerful network where people would meet and do business.
We sometimes tend to forget that our ancestors were nearly as good at networking as we are. Arguably their financial success and very survival may have been predicated on these religious and trade associations. The larger landowners in a given area would likely belong to more the one Guild. We find the BROME family as far back as the 1300’s in Guild of the Holy Cross in Stratford on Avon (founded in 1353). We also find them in the Guild of St Anne in Knowle where records begin in 1451. Although many would belong to just one Guild the wealthy may have belonged to several. And although one would presuppose the Guild had a tight geographic area that is not always the case. Knowle’s Guild through the monastery’s land holdings included membership for Solihull, Henely in Arden, Erdington, Corley (north of Coventry) Brailes, Wiloughby, Shuckburgh, Shenington and Halesowen. And members could be even farther afield.
So this really is a long winded way of justifying gophering. If we pay attention to things we learn in one place, they can turn out to be valuable in a completely different venue, simply because we learned something about the way things work. So maybe you spent 5 days or 5 years tracking down an ancestor that turns out not to be yours. I can assure you, what you discovered is not lost energy. The tunneling down gopher holes is not wasted. Something you learned will pop up again, and you will know just where to go because you have been there before.
I do believe that those with more open minds, and well developed intuition will be rewarded as much or not more as the more traditional or methodical researchers ( although both both bring their own rewards). If you are a gopher, take heart, in the end you will be rewarded. New discoveries sometimes take looking at data from a new perspective and there’s nothing like gophering to change your perspective. It could be a novel, a TV program or a book on a completely unrelated matter. It can all be put to good use, eventually.
As for Nicholas BROOME, he twice murdered and at his behest is buried just inside the door of St. Michael’s Church at Baddesley Clinton, standing upright so that in a final act of penance, people will trod upon his head for ever more. Thank you grandfather Nicholas for continuing to be a source of inspiration. And thank you Anne Elliott for bringing his story to life.
Kelly Wheaton Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved
































